General Teamsters Local No. 126

42 Cited authorities

Hormel v. Helvering
312 U.S. 552 (1941) Cited 969 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding an exception to the waiver rule exists in "those in which there have been judicial interpretations of existing law after decision below and pending appeal—interpretations which if applied might have materially altered the result"
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Labor Board v. Insurance Agents
361 U.S. 477 (1960) Cited 324 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
Hughes v. Superior Court
339 U.S. 460 (1950) Cited 285 times
In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
366 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 186 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
341 U.S. 694 (1951) Cited 246 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl
315 U.S. 769 (1942) Cited 236 times
Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing
Carpenters Union v. Ritter's Cafe
315 U.S. 722 (1942) Cited 174 times
Upholding state law outlawing secondary picketing
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers
400 U.S. 297 (1971) Cited 73 times
Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work
Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.
341 U.S. 665 (1951) Cited 126 times
Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

General Teamsters Local No. 126

42 Cited authorities

Holding an exception to the waiver rule exists in "those in which there have been judicial interpretations of existing law after decision below and pending appeal—interpretations which if applied might have materially altered the result"

Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.

Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing

Upholding state law outlawing secondary picketing

Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work

Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"