§

General Teamsters Local No. 324

122 N.L.R.B. 25 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
General Teamsters Local No. 324

8 Cited authorities

  1. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach

    228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 67 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".

  3. National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Gen. Drivers, Etc

    225 F.2d 205 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 43 times

    No. 15305. August 2, 1955. Miss Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., N.L.R.B., Silver Springs, Md., Owsley Vose, Asso. Ch. Enf. Br., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Cnsl., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Samuel M. Singer, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Chris Dixie, Houston, Tex., Mullinax Wells, Dallas, Tex., Dixie, Ryan Schulman, Houston, Tex., for respondents. Before RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS and DE VANE, District Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge

  4. Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.

    75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948)   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.

  5. Sales Drivers, Etc. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    229 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 24 times
    Noting that "the fact of concerted activity at a common situs where one not common was available" does not itself establish a secondary boycott violation

  6. Minneapolis St. L. Ry. v. Pac. Gamble Co.

    215 F.2d 126 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times

    No. 14768. August 20, 1954. Richard Musenbrock, Minneapolis, Minn. (C.W. Wright, William J. Powell and George M. Stephenson, San Pedro, Cal., on the brief), for appellant. Perry R. Moore, Minneapolis, Minn. (Floyd E. Nelson and Mackall, Crounse, Moore, Helmey Palmer, Minneapolis, Minn., on the brief), for appellee. Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH and JOHNSEN, Circuit Judges. JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge. A shipper sought damages against a railroad for failing, upon request, to switch in cars to its plant, to

  7. Montgomery Ward Co. v. Northern Pacific Term. Co.

    128 F. Supp. 475 (D. Or. 1953)   Cited 16 times

    Civ. A. No. 1686. June 30, 1953. Stuart S. Ball, John A. Barr, David L. Dickson, William L. Niemann, Chicago, Ill., and Stephen Parker, Portland, Or., for Montgomery Ward Co. Roy F. Shields, Joseph Berkshire, Portland, Or., Dean H. Eastman, Seattle, Wash., for Northern Pacific Terminal Co. of Oregon. Charles A. Hart, Portland, Or., Clark A. Eckart, Seattle, Wash., for Great Northern Railway Co. Charles A. Hart, Fletcher Rockwood, Portland, Or., Dean H. Eastman, Clark A. Eckart, Seattle, Wash., for

  8. Brewery Wkrs. L. Un. No. 67 v. N.L.R.B

    220 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 12115, 12207. Argued December 3, 1954. Decided March 10, 1955. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Thomas X. Dunn, William J. Walsh and Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., were on the briefs, for petitioner in No. 12,115. Mr. Earle K. Shawe and Mr. William J. Rosenthal, a member of the bar of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Allan Kamerow, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for Washington