§

General Teamsters, Local 982

181 N.L.R.B. 515 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
General Teamsters, Local 982

6 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Houston Insulation Contractors Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 664 (1967)   Cited 29 times
    In Houston Insulation Contractors' Ass'n v. NLRB, 386 U.S. 664, 87 S.Ct. 1278, 18 L.Ed.2d 389 (1967), the Court, relying largely on the reasoning in National Woodwork, held that a work preservation agreement between a company and a local union could be effectuated by another local of the same union.

  3. Orange Belt Dist. Coun. of Ptrs. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 534 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 56 times

    No. 17388. Argued November 6, 1963. Decided January 30, 1964. Mr. Herbert M. Ansell, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for petitioners. Mr. David Barr, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioners. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board

  4. District No. 9 v. N.L.R.B

    315 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 24 times

    No. 16901. Argued September 27, 1962. Decided November 15, 1962. Mr. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations

  5. Associated Indep. Owner-Operators v. N.L.R.B

    407 F.2d 1383 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 14 times
    In Associated, the Ninth Circuit held that the Board's finding that certain owner-operators were employees was not supported by substantial evidence and that, in fact, the owner-operators were independent contractors.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Teamsters, Etc.

    342 F.2d 18 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 18 times

    No. 225, Docket 29096. Argued December 8, 1964. Decided March 3, 1965. Stephen B. Goldberg, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., of counsel), for petitioner. Harry Pozefsky, Gloversville, N.Y., for respondent. Before WATERMAN, MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges. MOORE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (the Board or NLRB) petitions for enforcement of its