General Teamsters Local 959

3 Cited authorities

  1. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
  2. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Ass'n of Bridge

    583 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 3 times

    No. 77-4015. October 12, 1978. Edward S. Dorsey (argued), Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gerald W. Alston (argued), Alston, Edwards, Scott Novak, Phoenix, Ariz, for respondent. On Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRILL and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge. Honorable Jack E. Tanner, United States District Judge of the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. MERRILL, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations