§

General Service Employees Union Local 73

239 N.L.R.B. 295 (N.L.R.B. 1978)
General Service Employees Union Local 73

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Labor Board v. Fruit Packers

    377 U.S. 58 (1964)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

  3. National Van Lines, Inc. v. United States

    355 F.2d 326 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 32 times
    Noting that the "inadvertent omission" of a brief note in a tariff "does not ipso facto change the meaning of the tariffs. At most, it creates an ambiguity or uncertainty."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers & Common Laborers of America

    389 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    No. 21569. January 25, 1968. Robert M. Lieber, Washington, D.C. (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Charles P. Scully, Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, Cal., W. Thomas Arruda, Oakland, Cal., Levy, DeRoy, Geffner Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before HAMLIN, DUNIWAY and

  5. Retail Clerks Union Local 770 v. N.L.R.B

    296 F.2d 368 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 26 times

    No. 15862. Argued March 2, 1961. Decided July 6, 1961. Petition for Rehearing Denied August 23, 1961. Mr. Tim L. Bornstein, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. S.G. Lippman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Mr. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen

  6. Int'l Chem. Wkrs. U. Loc. 483 v. N.L.R.B

    561 F.2d 253 (D.C. Cir. 1977)   Cited 6 times
    In International Chemical Workers Union Local 483 v. NLRB, 561 F.2d 253 (D.C. Cir. 1977), this court was explicit that "[w]hether [two entities are] joint employers" under the National Labor Relations Act "depends upon the amount of actual and potential control that" the putative joint employer "ha[s] over the * * * employees," id. at 255 (emphasis added).

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Un. Operating Engineers

    317 F.2d 638 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 12 times
    Finding the building and construction industry is an industry affecting commerce

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec. Wkrs., Afl-Cio

    432 F.2d 965 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 5 times
    Upholding NLRB's finding that union statement that it would picket unless secondary employer ceased doing business with primary employer constituted an unlawful threat