§

General Motors LLC

368 NLRB No. 68 (N.L.R.B. 2019)
General Motors LLC

26 Cited authorities

  1. Faragher v. Boca Raton

    524 U.S. 775 (1998)   Cited 9,267 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to be actionable, the alleged conduct "must be extreme" and "the sporadic use of abusive language, gender-related jokes, and occasional teasing" are not enough

  2. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc.

    523 U.S. 75 (1998)   Cited 5,146 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hatever evidentiary route the plaintiff chooses to follow, he or she must always prove that the conduct at issue was not merely tinged with offensive . . . connotations"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 751 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

  4. Letter Carriers v. Austin

    418 U.S. 264 (1974)   Cited 605 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union newsletter's description of a “scab” as a “traitor” could not be construed as a factual assertion

  5. Castleberry v. STI Grp.

    863 F.3d 259 (3d Cir. 2017)   Cited 415 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the use of an unambiguous racial epithet by a supervisor, immediately followed by a threat of termination, created a hostile work environment

  6. Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

    487 U.S. 1205 (1988)   Cited 105 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pier Sixty, LLC

    855 F.3d 115 (2d Cir. 2017)   Cited 11 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "even an apparently meritorious challenge to the authority of an NLRB agent in itself does not qualify as an ‘exceptional circumstance’ allowing the party to raise the argument for the first time before our Court"

  8. Consol. Commc'ns, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    837 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2016)   Cited 9 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 14–1135 C/w 14–1140 09-13-2016 Consolidated Communications, Inc., doing business as Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL–CIO, Local 702, Intervenor Robert T. Dumbacher, Atlanta, GA, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Kurt G. Larkin, Richmond, VA, David C. Lonergan, and Amber M. Rogers, Dallas, TX. Joel A. Heller, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board,

  9. Caterpillar Logistics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    835 F.3d 536 (6th Cir. 2016)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 15–1433/1611 07-19-2016 Caterpillar Logistics, Inc., Petitioner/Cross–Respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/Cross–Petitioner, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Intervening Respondent. ARGUED: Joseph J. Torres, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Petitioner/Cross–Respondent. Valerie L. Collins, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent/Cross–Petitioner. Kristin Seifert Watson, Cloppert

  10. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    866 F.3d 885 (8th Cir. 2017)   Cited 7 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Citing Bailey v. Runyon, 167 F.3d 466, 468 (8th Cir. 1999) for the proposition that "Title VII does not require an employer to fire a harasser.... Rather, what an employer must do is to take prompt remedial action reasonably calculated to end the harassment."

  11. Section 1981 - Equal rights under the law

    42 U.S.C. § 1981   Cited 37,814 times   234 Legal Analyses
    Granting equal rights to "make and enforce contracts" without regard to race