§

General Motors Corp.

243 N.L.R.B. 186 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
General Motors Corp.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization

    420 U.S. 50 (1975)   Cited 125 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that wildcat strikers are bargaining separately and are therefore not protected by the NLRA

  3. Rowe v. General Motors Corporation

    457 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 326 times
    Holding that GM's promotion/transfer standards "freeze" into effect the racial disparity in salaried jobs created by the company's prior policy of explicit discrimination

  4. Lodges 743 and 1746, Etc. v. United Aircraft

    534 F.2d 422 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 151 times
    Holding that "[w]hether to award prejudgment interest in cases arising under federal law has in the absence of a statutory directive been placed in the sound discretion of the district courts"

  5. Local Un. No. 12, v. N.L.R.B

    368 F.2d 12 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 90 times

    No. 22239. November 9, 1966. Clarence Rhea, Gadsden, Ala., Robert L. Carter, New York City, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and GARZA, District Judge. THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum Plastic Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 12 (hereinafter referred to as Local 12), initiated these proceedings to review

  6. N.L.R.B. v. General Electric Company

    418 F.2d 736 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 63 times
    Offering better terms to union locals while bargaining with the unions' national bargaining representative

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Rockwell-Standard, Trans. Axle

    410 F.2d 953 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 44 times

    No. 18651. May 29, 1969. Leonard M. Wagman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Neal J. Conway, Atty., Washington, D.C., on brief. Leonard L. Scheinholtz, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent, Jonathan L. Alder, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief. Before PHILLIPS, EDWARDS and PECK, Circuit Judges. Judge Edwards took no part in the consideration of decision of this case

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Frontier Homes Corporation

    371 F.2d 974 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 31 times

    No. 18459. February 6, 1967. Rehearing Denied March 2, 1967. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief. Frederick S. Cassman, Omaha, Neb., for respondent, Abrahams, Kaslow Cassman, Omaha, Neb., were with him on the brief. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, GIBSON and HEANEY, Circuit Judges

  9. Sears, Roebuck Co v. Equal Emp. Opportunity

    581 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 77-1822, 77-1995 and 77-1996. Argued March 31, 1978. Decided June 9, 1978. As Amended July 26, 1978. Rehearing Denied July 26, 1978. S. Richard Pincus, Chicago, Ill., for appellant in No. 77-1822 and cross appellee in Nos. 77-1995 and 77-1996. J. Ramon V. Gomez, Atty., E.E.O.C., Washington, D.C., with whom Beatrice Rosenberg, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Raj K. Gupta, Atty., E.E.O.C., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for appellee in No. 77-1822 and cross appellants in Nos. 77-1995 and 77-1996. Barbara

  10. General Electric Co. v. N.L.R.B

    466 F.2d 1177 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 17 times
    In General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B., 466 F.2d 1177 (6th Cir. 1972), we held that it is an unfair labor practice within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) for an employer to fail to furnish requested data which is relevant to a union's role as bargaining agent.

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,091 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

  12. Section 60-2.1 - Scope and application

    41 C.F.R. § 60-2.1   Cited 22 times   18 Legal Analyses

    (a)General. The requirements of this part apply to nonconstruction (supply and service) contractors. The regulations prescribe the contents of affirmative action programs, standards and procedures for evaluating the compliance of affirmative action programs implemented pursuant to this part, and related matters. (b)Who must develop affirmative action programs. (1) Each nonconstruction contractor must develop and maintain a written affirmative action program for each of its establishments if it has