§

General Fabrications Corp.

08-CA-029443 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 20, 2005)
General Fabrications Corp.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation

    354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 96 times
    In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. General Fabrications Corp.

    222 F.3d 218 (6th Cir. 2000)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding the NLRB is entitled to summary enforcement of unchallenged portions of orders

  4. N.L.R.B. v. So-White Freight Lines, Inc.

    969 F.2d 401 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 13 times

    No. 91-1697. Argued December 11, 1991. Decided July 23, 1992. Paul J. Spielberg, Michael J. Gan (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph A. Szabo, Director, N.L.R.B., Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Paul Cady, Paul J. Zech (argued), Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon Vogt, Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent. Before FLAUM, and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges, and WILL, Senior District Judge. The Honorable Hubert

  5. Lundy Packing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    856 F.2d 627 (4th Cir. 1988)   Cited 15 times
    Listing factors relevant to reasonable diligence in job search

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Rice Lake Creamery Company

    365 F.2d 888 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 15 times
    Following Mastro Plastics

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Carpenters Un.

    433 F.2d 934 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 6 times

    No. 22296. October 22, 1970. Arnold L. Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg and Avrum M. Goldberg, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Victor J. Van Bourg, of Levy and Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES, HAMLEY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case is before us upon petition of the National Labor