§

General Electric Co.

188 N.L.R.B. 911 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
General Electric Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  3. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  4. General Elec., Battery Prod., v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.2d 713 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 24 times

    No. 24548. August 22, 1968. Rehearing Denied October 28, 1968. Robert C. Lanquist, Otto R.T. Bowden, Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas R. Beech, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Frank Hamilton, Jr., Tampa, Fla., amicus curiae. Before BELL, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: In our assessment of another industrial drama, we again turn to the rise and decline of a local union: its birth and early struggles

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Western Wirebound Box Co.

    356 F.2d 88 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 19 times
    Analyzing ALJ decision in light of Truitt cautionary language

  6. Standard Oil Co. of Calif., W.O. v. N.L.R.B

    399 F.2d 639 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 15 times
    In Standard Oil, the court upheld the Board's conclusion that the furnishing of employee addresses was relevant and necessary to the union's performance of its responsibilities in collective bargaining and contract administration, and it required that the employer furnish the requested list of addresses.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co.

    187 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 34 times

    No. 107, Docket 21789. Argued February 7, 1951. Decided March 28, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Raymond M. Norton, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton Devans, Rochester, N.Y., for respondent; Arthur L. Stern and William H. Morris, Rochester, N Y, of counsel. Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK,

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    217 F.2d 593 (4th Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times

    No. 6883. November 18, 1954. Decided December 8, 1954. Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and James A. Ryan, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition by the National Labor

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Northwestern Publishing Company

    343 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 11 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Northwestern Publishing Company, 343 F.2d 521, 525 (7th Cir. 1965), the court held that "although the information might be secured from the employees themselves, this did not relieve the company from this duty [of supplying the information]."