§

General Electric Co.

173 N.L.R.B. 164 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
General Electric Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  3. Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 56 times
    In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

  4. Fafnir Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B

    362 F.2d 716 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 24 times
    Relying upon the “clear and unmistakable waiver” rule

  5. J.I. Case Company v. National Labor Rel. Board

    253 F.2d 149 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 20 times
    In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. C C Plywood Corp.

    351 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times
    In C C Plywood the Supreme Court said that the disputed contract provision, in dealing with increases for "particular employee[s]", did not authorize a unilateral increase for a group of employees which would invalidate previously negotiated wage differentials.

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Otis Elevator Co.

    208 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 14 times

    No. 28, Docket 22727. Argued October 6, 1953. Decided November 10, 1953. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and Mary E. Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Fayette S. Dunn, New York City, and Helen F. Humphrey, Washington, D.C. (Denham Humphrey, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent