§

General Electric Co.

143 N.L.R.B. 926 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
General Electric Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Williams

    195 F.2d 669 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 23 times

    No. 6370. Argued March 6, 1952. Decided April 1, 1952. Arnold Ordman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., and Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Takoma Park, Md., on the brief), for petitioner. Isadore S. Bernstein, Columbia, S.C. (Randolph Murdaugh, Hampton, S.C., and Henry H. Edens, Columbia

  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Kropp Forge Co.

    178 F.2d 822 (7th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Kropp Forge Co., 7 Cir., 178 F.2d 822, and in N.L.R.B. v. La Salle Steel Co., 7 Cir., 178 F.2d 829, our examination and consideration of the entire record in each of those cases convinced us that there was a general pattern and plan of anti-union hostility justifying the Board in finding that the particular words and acts complained of were coercive.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

    179 F.2d 323 (8th Cir. 1950)   Cited 19 times

    No. 14013. January 16, 1950. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Thomas J. McDermott, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. on the brief), for petitioner. Robert H. Tucker, St. Paul, Minn. (Connolly, Tucker Post, St. Paul, Minn., on the brief), for respondent. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN, and RIDDICK, Circuit Judges. SANBORN, Circuit Judge. The National

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Valley Broadcast

    189 F.2d 582 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 8 times

    No. 11212. June 1, 1951. Louis Schwartz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Louis Schwartz, and Robert G. Johnson, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Carl A. Weinman, Steubenville, Ohio, for respondent. Carl A. Weinman, Berkman, Weinman Anglin, Steubenville, Ohio, Allen H. Berkman, Robert Engel, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief. Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges. HICKS, Chief Judge. Petition of the National Labor Relations