General Drivers & Dairy Employees Loc. Un. 563
3 Cited authorities
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
341 U.S. 694 (1951) Cited 246 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
Taylor v. Portland Paramount Corp.
383 F.2d 634 (9th Cir. 1967) Cited 97 timesHolding that "the mere allegations of the complaint, when contradicted by affidavits," are not enough to confer personal jurisdiction — "facts, not mere allegations, must be the touchstone."
New Power Wire and Electric Corp. v. N.L.R.B
340 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1965) Cited 8 timesNos. 196, 197, Docket 28597, 28627. Argued December 18, 1964. Decided January 7, 1965. Leonard Seiser, New York City, for petitioner employer. Glen M. Bendixsen, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for Board as respondent and petitioner. Harold Stern, New York City (Norman Rothfeld, New York City, of counsel), for respondent Union. Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and MARSHALL