General Cable Corp.
8 Cited authorities
Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.
363 U.S. 574 (1960) Cited 5,612 times 6 Legal AnalysesHolding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”
Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.
363 U.S. 593 (1960) Cited 3,893 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator
Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.
363 U.S. 564 (1960) Cited 2,229 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”
Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills
353 U.S. 448 (1957) Cited 2,323 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts
Teamsters Local v. Lucas Flour Co.
369 U.S. 95 (1962) Cited 1,181 timesHolding that "under the mandate of Lincoln Mills " federal labor law is "paramount" when deciding issues raised under § 301
Charles Dowd Box Co. v. Courtney
368 U.S. 502 (1962) Cited 575 timesHolding that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over § 301 claims
Retail Clerks v. Lion Dry Goods
369 U.S. 17 (1962) Cited 181 timesHolding that agreements other than full-fledged collective bargaining agreements may be "contracts" within the meaning of § 301
Leedom v. International Bhd. of Elec. Wkrs
278 F.2d 237 (D.C. Cir. 1960) Cited 48 timesPermitting independent union to intervene in decertification proceeding