§
Generac Corp.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  3. International Bhd. of Op. Potters v. N.L.R.B

    320 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times

    Nos. 17300, 17463. Argued May 1, 1963. Decided June 13, 1963. Mr. Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff and Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 17300 and intervenor in No. 17463. Mr. Theo. F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., with whom Mr. William B. Devaney, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 17463 and intervenor in No. 17300. Mr. Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Supreme

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Gale Prod., Div., Outboard Marine

    337 F.2d 390 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times
    In NLRB v. Gale Prods., 337 F.2d 390 (7th Cir. 1964), denying enforcement of 142 N.L.R.B. 1246, by a divided court, the Seventh Circuit declined enforcement.