Gem Urethane Corp.

9 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.
416 U.S. 267 (1974) Cited 759 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.
306 U.S. 240 (1939) Cited 281 times
In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.
Labor Board v. Burnup Sims
379 U.S. 21 (1964) Cited 106 times 21 Legal Analyses
Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
N.L.R.B. v. W. C. McQuaide, Inc.
552 F.2d 519 (3d Cir. 1977) Cited 40 times
In McQuaide, supra, we stated flatly: "Rather than focus on either the subjective intent of the striker or the perception of the `victim,' we adopt an objective standard to determine whether conduct constitutes a threat sufficiently egregious to justify" the imposition of sanctions by the employer.
Local 542, Int'l Un. of Oper. E. v. N.L.R.B
328 F.2d 850 (3d Cir. 1964) Cited 44 times
No. 14286. Argued October 10, 1963. Decided March 13, 1964. Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Martin J. Vigderman, Wilfred F. Lorry, Freedman, Landy Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Leo Maguire, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Earle K. Shawe, Baltimore, Md. (Sidney J. Barban, Baltimore,
Stop Shop Companies, Inc., Etc. v. N.L.R.B
548 F.2d 17 (1st Cir. 1977) Cited 18 times 1 Legal Analyses
Enforcing the Board's conclusion that pharmacy managers were not supervisors even though the managers filled out performance review forms concerning clerks that sometimes played some part in the grant of merit raises
Campbell Soup Company v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
380 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1967) Cited 12 times
In Campbell Soup Co. v. N.L.R.B., 380 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1967), we held invalid for vagueness and indefiniteness a ban on solicitation during "Company working hours."

Gem Urethane Corp.

9 Cited authorities

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.

Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

In McQuaide, supra, we stated flatly: "Rather than focus on either the subjective intent of the striker or the perception of the `victim,' we adopt an objective standard to determine whether conduct constitutes a threat sufficiently egregious to justify" the imposition of sanctions by the employer.

Enforcing the Board's conclusion that pharmacy managers were not supervisors even though the managers filled out performance review forms concerning clerks that sometimes played some part in the grant of merit raises

In Campbell Soup Co. v. N.L.R.B., 380 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1967), we held invalid for vagueness and indefiniteness a ban on solicitation during "Company working hours."