§

Gem Management Co.

339 N.L.R.B. 489 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Gem Management Co.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 115 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  3. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  4. Longshoremen v. Ariadne Co.

    397 U.S. 195 (1970)   Cited 51 times
    Holding that American residents hired by a foreign ship to work on an American dock did not involve the internal affairs of a foreign ship

  5. Operating Engr. Pen. Trust v. Cecil Backhoe

    795 F.2d 1501 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 51 times
    Finding that a party's argument that he was not aware of the legal consequence of signing an agreement is not a valid defense.

  6. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  7. Kemmis v. McGoldrick

    767 F.2d 594 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times

    No. 83-6292. Argued and Submitted February 8, 1985. Decided July 29, 1985. Wayne Jett, Jett, Clifford Laquer, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs/appellees. James T. Winkler, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Rudd Romo, Long Beach, Cal., for defendants/appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before BOOCHEVER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge. The Honorable Gus J. Solomon, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon

  8. Seymour v. Coughlin Co.

    609 F.2d 346 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 33 times
    Approving the use of notice of modification in terminating contract in East Bay Union of Machinists, Local 1304 v. Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp., 285 F. Supp. 282, 287 (N.D.Cal. 1968)

  9. Cedar Valley Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    977 F.2d 1211 (8th Cir. 1992)   Cited 16 times
    In Cedar Valley, we enforced the Board's order that an employer was bound by a subsequent § 8(f) pre-hire agreement in virtually identical circumstances.

  10. Const. Teamsters, v. Con Form Const. Corp.

    657 F.2d 1101 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 23 times
    In Construction Teamsters Health Welfare Trust v. Con Form Construction Corp., 657 F.2d 1101 (9th Cir. 1981), the clause at issue read, "the parties hereto agree to be bound by... all supplemental agreements thereto,... and all renewals, changes, or modifications."

  11. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,062 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB