§

GEM International, Inc.

137 N.L.R.B. 1343 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
GEM International, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  3. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  4. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  5. Labor Board v. Mine Workers

    355 U.S. 453 (1958)   Cited 47 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 64. Argued January 6, 1958. Decided February 3, 1958. The National Labor Relations Board found that an employer had committed an unfair labor practice by assisting a union to defeat the efforts of a rival union to organize the employer's workers, but that the assisted union was not dominated by the employer. It ordered the employer to post certain notices and to withdraw and withhold recognition from the assisted

  6. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    280 F.2d 616 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 15038, 15079. Argued December 3, 1959. Decided May 19, 1960. Mr. Charles J. Morris, Dallas, Tex., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 15038. Mr. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Marcel Mallet-Prevost

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Accurate Forming

    288 F.2d 818 (3d Cir. 1961)

    No. 13405. Argued March 21, 1961. Decided April 12, 1961. Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harry Weinstock, New York City (Henry Brickman, Weinstock Tauber, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Local 810. William P. Reiss, Newark, N.J. (Pitney, Hardin Ward, Newark