Geilich Tanning Co.
3 Cited authorities
Roland Co. v. Walling
326 U.S. 657 (1946) Cited 173 timesIn Roland Co. v. Walling, 326 U.S. 657, 66 S.Ct. 413, 90 L.Ed. 383 (1946), the Court held inter alia that a business engaged in commercial wiring, electrical contracting for industry, and repair and replacement of electric motors and generators did not constitute a "retail or service establishment."
National Labor Rel. Board v. Baltimore T. Co.
140 F.2d 51 (4th Cir. 1944) Cited 57 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore T. Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 51, the court alluded with apparent approval to the fact that the Board had endeavored to avoid making its sanctions operate retroactively.
Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board
138 F.2d 86 (3d Cir. 1943) Cited 8 timesNo. 8054. Argued November 2, 1942. Decided September 7, 1943. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 25, 1943. On petition to Review the Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings by the National Labor Relations Board against the Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Company for disestablishment of the Budd Employee Representation Association, which intervened, and reinstatement of two discharged employees of the company. On the company's petition to review the Board's order requiring disestablishment