§
Geigy Co., Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Continental Oil Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Board

    113 F.2d 473 (10th Cir. 1940)   Cited 38 times
    In Continental Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 113 F.2d 473, 477 (10 Cir., 1940) one of the questions was "The identity of the union".

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Motor B. Co.

    105 F.2d 652 (9th Cir. 1939)   Cited 39 times

    No. 8869. June 2, 1939. As Amended June 15, 1939. On Petition for the Enforcement of, and on Petition to Review and Set Aside, an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, against the National Motor Bearing Company, for enforcement of an order issued by the Board, consolidated with a proceeding by the International Association of Machinists and Production Workers, Local 1518, affiliated with International Association of Machinists,

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Ken Rose Motors

    193 F.2d 769 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 6 times

    No. 4605. January 21, 1952. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Abraham Siegel, Attorney, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Edmund J. Blake, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, as amended