§

Gazette Publishing Co.

101 N.L.R.B. 1694 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
Gazette Publishing Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Auto. Workers v. Wis. Board

    336 U.S. 245 (1949)   Cited 209 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that issuance of injunction by state labor relations authority that orders state employees back to work does not violate Thirteenth Amendment because employees had the right to quit employment

  2. Labor Board v. Highland Park Co.

    341 U.S. 322 (1951)   Cited 63 times
    In Highland it was claimed that the term "national or international labor organization" as used in the National Labor Relations Act is a technical one, meaning "union", thereby excluding the CIO, which was "a federation".

  3. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Condenser Corp.

    128 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 62 times

    No. 7683. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided March 25, 1942. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against Condenser Corporation of America and Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corporation, and Electrical Condensers Union, Local B-1041, of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, intervenor. A petition for leave to adduce additional evidence was filed. Petition for an enforcing decree granted with

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. Montgomery Ward Co., 157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946), the employees remained on their job but refused to handle any clerical work originating from another of the employer's plants which was on strike.

  5. West Texas Utilities v. National Labor R. BD

    184 F.2d 233 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In West Texas Utilities Co. v. National Labor R. Bd., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 179, 184 F.2d 233, 239, the District of Columbia Court said: "The failure of union officers to comply with 9(h) does not in any way relieve an employer of the paramount obligation to bargain collectively in good faith.

  6. C.G. CONN, LIMITED v. NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD

    108 F.2d 390 (7th Cir. 1939)   Cited 32 times

    No. 6848. December 22, 1939. Petition by C.G. Conn, Limited, to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the board's answer requested the court to affirm and enforce its order. Petition to review granted, and petition of the board for enforcement of its order denied. Verne G. Cawley, of Elkhart, Ind., for petitioner. Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Mortimer B. Wolf, Bertram Edises, and Malcolm S. Mason, Attys

  7. Home Beneficial Life Ins. v. N.L.R.B

    159 F.2d 280 (4th Cir. 1947)   Cited 23 times
    In Home Beneficial Life Ins. Co., the employee insurance agents refused to report to their offices daily as they were required to do.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mt. Clemens Pottery

    147 F.2d 262 (6th Cir. 1945)   Cited 23 times
    In NLRB v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 147 F.2d 262 (6th Cir. 1945), the Sixth Circuit reached a like result for employees who refused to work overtime, as did the Eighth Circuit in NLRB v. Montgomery Ward Co., 157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946), for employees who refused to perform a part of their clerical duties.

  9. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Clark Shoe Co.

    189 F.2d 731 (1st Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 4550. June 19, 1951. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and Maurice Alexandre, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Maurice Epstein, Boston, Mass. (Benjamin E. Gordon and Gordon Epstein, all of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The

  10. Prutton v. Marzall

    191 F.2d 341 (D.C. Cir. 1951)   Cited 1 times

    No. 10704. Argued March 16, 1951. Decided June 21, 1951. Oscar C. Limbach, of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Ohio, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, Cleveland, Ohio, with whom Almon S. Nelson, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellants. Joseph Schimmel, United States Patent Office, Washington, D.C., with whom E.L. Reynolds, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee. Before PRETTYMAN, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges. WASHINGTON