§

Gatliff Business Products, Inc. And Rbc Service Corp.

276 N.L.R.B. 543 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Gatliff Business Products, Inc. And Rbc Service Corp.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

    384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"

  5. Larand Leisurelies, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    523 F.2d 814 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 37 times

    No. 74-2325. Argued June 10, 1975. Decided October 1, 1975. As Amended October 15, 1975. W. Bruce Baird, Matthew R. Westfall, Middleton, Reutlinger Baird, Louisville, Ky., Jay S. Siegel, Siegel, O'Connor Kainen, Hartford, Conn., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Hope P. Zelasko, Emil C. Farkas, Regional Director, 9th Region, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Herbert L. Segal, Irwin H. Cutler, Jr., Segal, Isenberg, Sales, Stewart Nutt

  6. N.L.R.B. v. St. Mary's Home, Inc.

    690 F.2d 1062 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 21 times
    Noting that the Board had been criticized for its policy bias

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Harmon Industries, Inc.

    565 F.2d 1047 (8th Cir. 1977)   Cited 14 times

    No. 77-1095. Submitted October 14, 1977. Decided November 22, 1977. Dorothy L. Moore, Washington, D.C., argued, and Jay E. Shanklin, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner, N.L.R.B. Gordon E. Jackson (argued), W. Kerby Bowling, and Michael R. Forman, Memphis, Tenn., on brief, for respondent, Harmon Industries. Petition

  8. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    424 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir. 1970)   Cited 20 times
    In Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. NLRB, 424 F.2d 1151 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831, 91 S.Ct. 63, 27 L.Ed.2d 62 (1970), the Seventh Circuit permitted the Board to use a 50% formula to determine whether certain workers could vote in a union election.

  9. Majestic Molded Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times
    In Majestic Molded Products, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., (2 Cir. 1964) 330 F.2d 603, 606, the layoffs were also in order of seniority.

  10. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    655 F.2d 932 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 7 times

    No. 79-7541. Argued and Submitted October 9, 1980. Decided March 12, 1981. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc November 12, 1981. James Adler, Munger, Tolles Rickershauser, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for appellant. Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief; Gary Green, Director, Legal Dept., Washington, D.C., for appellee. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges and PFAELZER, District Judge. The Honorable Mariana