§

Gary B. Brill, Complainant, Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency

01970511 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 31, 2000)
Gary B. Brill, Complainant, Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency

5 Cited authorities

  1. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.

    527 U.S. 471 (1999)   Cited 2,906 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that " person whose physical or mental impairment is corrected by medication or other measures does not have an impairment that presently 'substantially limits' a major life activity."

  2. Albertsons, Inc. v. Kirkingburg

    527 U.S. 555 (1999)   Cited 686 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although vision-impaired individuals may not have "an onerous burden" in demonstrating disability and "ordinarily will meet the [ADA]'s definition of disability," they must still offer evidence of "limitation in terms of their own experience"

  3. Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

    527 U.S. 516 (1999)   Cited 504 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "determination of [a person's] disability is made with reference to the mitigating measures he employs."

  4. Section 1630.2 - Definitions

    29 C.F.R. § 1630.2   Cited 8,460 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding that major life activity is substantially limited if plaintiff is "significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes as compared to the average person having comparable training, skills and abilities"

  5. Appendix to Part 1630 - Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1630, app to Part 1630   Cited 869 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether an individual is substantially limited in a major life activity entails the nature and severity of the impairment; the duration or expected duration of the impairment; and the permanent or long term impact