§

Garwood--Detroit Truck Equipment, Inc.

274 N.L.R.B. 113 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Garwood--Detroit Truck Equipment, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  3. Los Angeles Marine Hardware Co. v. N.L.R.B

    602 F.2d 1302 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 18 times

    No. 78-1907. May 2, 1979. Anthony T. Oliver, Jr. (argued), Parker, Milliken, Clark O'Hara, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners. Elliott Moore, Michael Nicholson (argued), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. On Petition to Review a Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and TEMPLAR, Senior District Judge. Of the District of Kansas. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: Los Angeles Marine Hardware Co. (LA Marine) and California Marine

  4. AMCAR Division, ACF Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    592 F.2d 422 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 16 times

    No. 77-1713. Submitted May 16, 1978. Decided February 6, 1979. John E. Jay of Parker, Chapin, Flattau Klimpl, New York City, for petitioner; Johnna G. Torsone, New York City, on the brief. John H. Ferguson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Frederick Havard, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Charles A. Werner of Schuchat

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Adams Dairy, Inc.

    350 F.2d 108 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 31 times
    In NLRB v. Adams Dairy, Inc., 350 F.2d 108 (8 Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 1011, 86 S.Ct. 619, 15 L.Ed.2d 526 (1966), we held that in the absence of union animus, a company has no legal duty to bargain with a union over the decision to partially shut down its operations because of economic reasons.