§

Garney Morris, Inc.

313 N.L.R.B. 101 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Garney Morris, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Eagle Material Handling, Inc.

    558 F.2d 160 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 36 times
    In Eagle Material, we held that a company violated the NLRA when it terminated an unpopular supervisor shortly before the union's representation election.

  4. Elec. Products Div. of Midland-Ross v. N.L.R.B

    617 F.2d 977 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 27 times
    In Electrical Products Division of Midland-Ross Corp. v. NLRB, 617 F.2d 977, 987 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871, 101 S.Ct. 210, 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980), we referred to three elements as usually found in these cases where we enforced a Gissel II order: effect of the unfair labor practices on a significant portion of the bargaining unit, the participation of senior company officials, and the continuing impact of the same factors that undermined the first election.

  5. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    585 F.2d 62 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 23 times
    Reopening of uneconomic plant would cost one million dollars plus operating loss of several hundred thousand dollars a year

  6. Kenworth Trucks of Philadelphia v. N.L.R.B

    580 F.2d 55 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 17 times

    No. 77-1939. Argued February 24, 1978. Decided March 30, 1978. Resubmitted for Reconsideration June 3, 1978. Rehearing Denied August 11, 1978. D. Barry Gibbons, Gibbons, Buckley and Smith, Media, Pa., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, John S. Irving, Marion L. Griffin, Norman Moscowitz, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before ADAMS, HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges, and BECHTLE, District Judge. United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. OPINION

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Sav-On Drugs, Inc.

    728 F.2d 1254 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 6 times
    Concluding that the employer could not reasonably rely on a regional director’s determination because it could be reversed on appeal

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Broad Street Hosp. and Medical Ctr.

    452 F.2d 302 (3d Cir. 1971)   Cited 12 times
    In Broad Street, supra, we held that the irrebuttable presumption which we upheld in Frick applies equally to a voluntarily recognized union even where the recognition was never reduced to writing.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Colonial Knitting Corp.

    464 F.2d 949 (3d Cir. 1972)   Cited 9 times
    Granting of wage increases on eve of certification election was coercive

  10. Toltec Metals, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    490 F.2d 1122 (3d Cir. 1974)   Cited 7 times

    No. 73-1209. Argued October 25, 1973. Decided January 25, 1974. John J. Bracken, Bracken Craig, Newark, N. J., for petitioner. Fredric Sagan, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before McLAUGHLIN, GIBBONS and ROSENN, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT ROSENN, Circuit Judge. This petition involves the basic duty of an employer to continue to bargain with a union whose representative status it has orally