§

Garner/Morrison, LLC

366 NLRB No. 184 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Garner/Morrison, LLC

6 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  3. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  4. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  5. NLRB v. CWI of Maryland, Inc.

    127 F.3d 319 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times
    Enforcing bargaining order where employer constructively discharged all bargaining unit employees

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sw. Reg'l Council of Carpenters

    826 F.3d 460 (D.C. Cir. 2016)   Cited 5 times

    No. 11-1212 C/w 11-1445 C/w 11-1446 06-21-2016 National Labor Relations Board, Respondent v. Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters and Garner/Morrison LLC, Petitioners. James A. Bowles argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Daniel M. Shanley. Nina Schichor, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Julie Broido, Supervisory