§
Garland Corp.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees

  3. Surprenant Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 60 times
    In Surprenant Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965) this Court approved as non-threatening, language of the employer which was much stronger than that used in the present case.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Stanton Enterprises, Inc.

    351 F.2d 261 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 6 times

    No. 9849. Argued June 4, 1965. Decided September 30, 1965. Wayne S. Bishop, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C. (Frederick F. Holroyd, Charleston, W. Va., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges, and WINTER, District Judge. SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge. Shortly after the

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Falls City Creamery

    207 F.2d 820 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14794. November 10, 1953. Martin Sacks, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Kansas City, Mo. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elizabeth W. Weston, and Henry Rose, Attys., all of National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harry R. Henatsch, Omaha, Neb. (Kennedy, Holland, DeLacy Svoboda, Omaha, Neb., on the brief), for respondent. Before GARDNER, Chief Judge, and WOODROUGH and

  7. Solvay Process Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    117 F.2d 83 (5th Cir. 1941)   Cited 14 times

    No. 9519. January 4, 1941. Rehearing Denied March 8, 1941. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Solvay Process Company for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board sitting at Washington, D.C. The Board prayed that the order be enforced. Petition dismissed; enforcement decree granted. C.V. Porter, of Baton Rouge, La., and T. Justin Moore and Edmund M. Preston, both of Richmond, Va., for petitioner. Victor A. Sachse, of Baton Rouge,