Gallup, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Power Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    40 F.3d 409 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that coincident timing and uncontested ยง 8 violations was sufficient evidence to support Board's finding
  4. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.

    554 F.2d 996 (10th Cir. 1977)   Cited 24 times
    Permitting inference
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Roney Plaza Apartments

    597 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 16 times
    Stating that a disciplinary action cannot stand where the primary justification for it is based on an unlawful rule