Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§
Galleria Joint Venture

8 Cited authorities

  1. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 556 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

  2. Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    424 U.S. 507 (1976)   Cited 548 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

  3. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  4. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  5. Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    968 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 19 times
    In Sparks Nugget, the Ninth Circuit went further by finding that the inaccessibility exception does not apply at all in situations where customers, and not employees, are the target audience; alternatively, the court stated that, even if the exception were applicable, Lechmere would require a finding that the intended audience is presumptively not inaccessible "because the targets of the union protest do not reside on the employer's property."

  6. Lechmere, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    914 F.2d 313 (1st Cir. 1990)   Cited 15 times

    No. 89-1683. Heard January 10, 1990. Decided September 17, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 25, 1990. Robert P. Joy, with whom Keith H. McCown and Morgan, Brown Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. Richard A. Cohen, Atty., with whom Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition for review of an order of the National

  7. Laborers' Local Union No. 204 v. N.L.R.B

    904 F.2d 715 (D.C. Cir. 1990)   Cited 3 times
    In Laborer's Local Union No. 204 v. NLRB, 904 F.2d 715 (D.C.Cir. 1990), the court reviewed an NLRB decision in a case involving facts similar to the present case.

  8. Sentry Markets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    914 F.2d 113 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 89-2883, 89-3261. Argued June 4, 1990. Decided September 26, 1990. David W. Croysdale and Robert M. Ling, Jr., Michael, Best Friedrich; and Kenneth R. Loebel, Previant, Goldberg, Uelman, Gratz, Miller Brueggeman, Milwaukee, Wis., for Sentry Markets Inc. Aileen A. Armstrong, Howard E. Perlstein, Joseph H. Bornong, Linda J. Dreeben, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, John C. Truesdale, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., and Philip E. Bloedorn, and Paul Bosanac, N.L.R.B., Region 30, Milwaukee