Galicks, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
440 U.S. 301 (1979) Cited 227 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Machinists Local v. Labor Board
362 U.S. 411 (1960) Cited 276 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.
351 U.S. 149 (1956) Cited 223 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
564 F.3d 469 (D.C. Cir. 2009) Cited 30 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that two-member NLRB cannot issue decisions
New Process Steel, L.P. v. N.L.R.B
564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009) Cited 15 times 4 Legal Analyses
In New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit concluded that a two-member panel of the NLRB — the same panel that adjudicated the instant case — "had authority to hear the labor dispute," id. at 848.
Northeastern Land v. National Labor Relations
560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009) Cited 14 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Northeastern Land Services v. NLRB, 560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009), the court held that, "[t]he Board's delegation of its institutional power to a panel that ultimately consisted of a two-member quorum because of a vacancy was lawful under the plain text of section 3(b)."
Mathews Readymix, Inc. v. N. L. R. B
165 F.3d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1999) Cited 5 times
Holding that uncontested coercive interrogation of replacement employees did not taint the employees' signatures on the decertification petition
Shoreline Enterprises of Am., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
262 F.2d 933 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 46 times
In Shoreline Enterprises of America, Inc. v. NLRB, 262 F.2d 933 (5 Cir. 1959), the court recognized that a Board agent is present not only to make sure eligible voters vote but also to make sure that an employee who thinks he is eligible may cast a challenged ballot.

Galicks, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

Holding that two-member NLRB cannot issue decisions

In New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit concluded that a two-member panel of the NLRB — the same panel that adjudicated the instant case — "had authority to hear the labor dispute," id. at 848.

In Northeastern Land Services v. NLRB, 560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009), the court held that, "[t]he Board's delegation of its institutional power to a panel that ultimately consisted of a two-member quorum because of a vacancy was lawful under the plain text of section 3(b)."

Holding that uncontested coercive interrogation of replacement employees did not taint the employees' signatures on the decertification petition

In Shoreline Enterprises of America, Inc. v. NLRB, 262 F.2d 933 (5 Cir. 1959), the court recognized that a Board agent is present not only to make sure eligible voters vote but also to make sure that an employee who thinks he is eligible may cast a challenged ballot.