§
GAF Corp.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Corp.

    303 U.S. 41 (1938)   Cited 1,429 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies mandated before seeking injunctive relief in court

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 234 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Dorn's Transportation Company

    405 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 40 times
    Noting that "a good faith effort to conform to the requirements of the law" would be a legal motivation for withholding benefits

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Walton Manufacturing Company

    289 F.2d 177 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 32 times

    No. 18345. March 17, 1961. Russell Specter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert T. Thompson, Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Wilson, Branch Barwick, J. Frank Ogletree, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This petition seeks enforcement

  7. J.J. Newberry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    442 F.2d 897 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 17 times
    In Newberry, the status quo with regard to wage increases was unclear not so much because wage review was not predictable — on the contrary, an employee was reviewed every six months, "although the timing might vary by several months," 442 F.2d at 898 — but because wage increases were neither "automatic nor uniform.

  8. Clark's Gamble Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    422 F.2d 845 (6th Cir. 1970)   Cited 14 times

    No. 18354. March 4, 1970. Shawe Rosenthal, Earle K. Shawe, Robert S. Hillman, Baltimore, Md., on brief of petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Associate Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assts. Gen. Counsel, Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief for respondent. Plone, Tomar, Parks Seliger, by Howard S. Simonoff, Camden, N.J., of counsel, S.G. Lippman, Gen. Counsel Retail Clerks International Assn., AFL-CIO, on brief for intervenor. Before WEICK, Chief Judge

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Dan Howard Mfg. Co.

    390 F.2d 304 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Dan Howard, supra, 390 F.2d at page 309, we further stated: "The court [Sixth Circuit] pointed out that it is relevant to consider the subjective intention of the signer and his expressed state of mind in deciding whether a misapprehension was knowingly induced."

  10. Federation of Un. Representatives v. N.L.R.B

    339 F.2d 126 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 407, 408, Dockets 28558, 28598. Argued June 10, 1964. Decided November 20, 1964. Sanford M. Katz, New York City, for Federation of Union Representatives. Emil Schlesinger, New York City (Julius Topol, New York City, on the brief), for International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union. Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for National

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,348 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355