§

Gado S.R.L. v. Jay-Y Enterprise Co., Inc.

No. 92047433re (T.T.A.B. Feb. 10, 2015)
Gado S.R.L. v. Jay-Y Enterprise Co., Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Bose Corp. v. QSC Audio Products, Inc.

    293 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 34 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Bose Corp. v. QSC Audio Prods., Inc., 293 F.3d 1367, 1375 (Fed.Cir.2002), this court held that the marks WAVE and ACOUSTIC WAVE have trademark strength independent of the Bose “house mark,” although the marks appear in the same sales literature.

  2. Hydro-Dynamics, Inc., v. George Putnam Co.

    811 F.2d 1470 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 41 times
    Recognizing that single bona fide shipment in commerce may support registration

  3. West Florida Seafood, Inc. v. Jet Restaurants

    31 F.3d 1122 (Fed. Cir. 1994)   Cited 21 times
    Recognizing that separate corporate, business and personal entities that operate as a single entity in the eyes of the consuming public may be treated as such for trademark purposes

  4. In re Bose Corp.

    772 F.2d 866 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 30 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding pentagonal shape of loudspeaker functional where applicant's promotional materials lauded shape as functional part of sound system

  5. B.R. Baker Co. v. Lebow Bros

    150 F.2d 580 (C.C.P.A. 1945)   Cited 11 times

    Patent Appeal No. 5030. June 25, 1945. Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents of United States Patent Office, Interference No. 3,358. Application filed in 1940 by the B.R. Baker Company for registration of a trade-mark. An interference was declared with two trade-marks registered by Lebow Brothers on applications filed in 1932 and later. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents reversing the decision of the Examiner, who had held that the B.R. Baker Company was the first user and owner of