G. H. Bass & Co.

Labor Board v. Steelworkers
357 U.S. 357 (1958) Cited 72 times
In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."
N.L.R.B. v. Ben Pekin Corp.
452 F.2d 205 (7th Cir. 1971) Cited 30 times
No. 18894. October 4, 1971. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Janet Skaare Morris, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Harold A. Katz, Irving M. Friedman, Charles Barnhill, Jr., Zenia S. Goodman, Chicago, Ill., Katz Friedman, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge, and KERNER and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This application by the
N.L.R.B. v. Transcon Lines
599 F.2d 719 (5th Cir. 1979) Cited 10 times
Holding the Board's mixed-use designation to be supported by substantial evidence because the drivers' room was an area where employees could relax, drink coffee or eat snacks, and converse freely even though some work was occasionally conducted there