8 Cited authorities
Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B
365 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1966) Cited 63 timesNos. 19452, 19515. Argued January 10, 1966. Decided June 27, 1966. Mr. Joel Field, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19452. Mr. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19515
N.L.R.B. v. Philamon Laboratories, Inc.
298 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1962) Cited 32 timesNo. 122, Docket 27028. Argued December 6, 1961. Decided January 17, 1962. William J. Avrutis, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Samuel M. Singer, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City, for respondent. Before MEDINA, SMITH and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. MARSHALL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations
Fort Smith Broadcasting Company v. N.L.R.B
341 F.2d 874 (8th Cir. 1965) Cited 23 timesNo. 17669. March 4, 1965. Allen P. Roberts, of Bethell Pearce, Fort Smith, Ark., made argument and filed brief, for petitioner. Peter Giesey, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for respondent and filed brief with Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. Before VOGEL, VAN OOSTERHOUT and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Epstein
203 F.2d 482 (3d Cir. 1953) Cited 23 timesNo. 10888. Argued January 23, 1953. Decided April 15, 1953. Rehearing Denied May 7, 1953. Harvey B. Diamond, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. James M. Quigley, Harrisburg, Pa. (Samuel A. Schreckengaust, Jr., McNees, Wallace Nurick, Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for respondents. Before GOODRICH, STALEY
N.L.R.B. v. H. Rohtstein Co.
266 F.2d 407 (1st Cir. 1959) Cited 11 timesIn NLRB v. Rohtstein Co., 266 F.2d 407, 409 (CA1, 1959), the First Circuit held that similar misrepresentations invalidated a card necessary for a majority, and therefore declined to enforce the Board's bargaining order.
N.L.R.B. v. Cactus Petroleum, Inc.
355 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 5 timesNo. 21961. February 2, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Willis Witt, Charles Sapp, Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, Circuit Judge, and HUNTER, District Judge. HUNTER, District Judge. The Board seeks enforcement of its decision and order, 134 NLRB 1254, holding
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"