§

Furriers Joint Council of New York, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO (The Resident Fur Buyers Association)

261 N.L.R.B. 701 (N.L.R.B. 1982)
Furriers Joint Council of New York, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO (The Resident Fur Buyers Association)

6 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Hot Water, Hydraulic Sprinkler, Pneumatic Tube, Ice Machine & General Pipefitters

    429 U.S. 507 (1977)   Cited 138 times
    Stating that if a union were to attempt to capture work it had previously acquiesced to non-union workers' performing, such conduct would serve "not to preserve, but to aggrandize, its own position and that of its members," concluding that "[s]uch activity is squarely within the statute" and thus prohibited

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    447 U.S. 490 (1980)   Cited 65 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Longshoremen, 447 U.S. 490 (1980) (ILA I), we reviewed the National Labor Relations Board's conclusion that the Rules and their enforcement constituted unlawful secondary activity under §§ 8(b)(4)(B) and 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4) (B) and 158(e).

  4. Amax Coal Co. v. N.L.R.B

    614 F.2d 872 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that "doing business under § 158(e) refers to a continuing business relationship, not to the sale of a facility

  5. Botany Indus. v. N.Y. Jt. Bd., Amal. Cloth. Wkrs.

    375 F. Supp. 485 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)   Cited 17 times
    In Botany Industries, Inc. v. New York Joint Board, 375 F. Supp. 485, 491 (S.D.N.Y. 1974), vacated on other grounds, 506 F.2d 1246 (2d Cir. 1974), no weight was given to the arbitrator's assumption about the parties' compliance with federal labor law, even though arbitrators, like the NLRB, are "`part of [the workplace] system of goverment...'.... [and have] knowledge of the common law of the shop...."

  6. George Koch Sons, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    490 F.2d 323 (4th Cir. 1973)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 73-1019, 73-1480. Argued October 3, 1973. Decided December 14, 1973. Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D.C. and Joseph A. Yocum, Evansville, Ind. (Johns Zimmerman, Washington, D.C. and Kahn, Dees, Donovan Kahn, Evansville, Ind., on brief), for petitioner in No. 73-1019. Gerard C. Smetana, Chicago, Ill. (Milton A. Smith, Gen. Counsel, Otto F. Wenzler and Richard B. Berman, Labor Relations Counsel, Washington, D.C., S. Richard Pincus, Lederer, Fox Grove, Chicago, Ill., on brief), for amicus curiae