§
FTS Corp.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  2. Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 64 times
    In Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 336 F.2d 128 (5 Cir. 1964), the court held that charges filed by the Union that alleged generally that the company had "engaged in * * * unfair labor practices within the meaning of" Section 8(a)(1) and (3), and then alleged specifically various acts of coercion against a named employee was sufficient to include unfair labor practices by the company against other employees which were not mentioned in the charges.

  3. Indiana Metal Products v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    202 F.2d 613 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 48 times

    No. 10717. March 10, 1953. Edward J. Fahy and Shultz Fahy, Rockford, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel and Ruth V. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the Indiana Metal Products Corporation

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Park Edge Sheridan Meats, Inc.

    341 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 24 times
    Stating that the General Counsel "will normally lose if the employer can establish a record of discharge for similar conduct"

  5. Modern Plastics Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    379 F.2d 201 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 16 times
    In Modern Plastics Corp. v. NLRB, 379 F.2d 201, 203 (6th Cir. 1967), this Court noted that "[t]here is a line between cooperation and domination, and the purpose of the Act is to encourage cooperation and discourage domination."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kohler Company

    220 F.2d 3 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 30 times

    Nos. 11272, 11283. March 7, 1955. Rehearing Denied April 7, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Irving M. Herman, Atty., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. William F. Howe, Washington, D.C., Lyman C. Conger, Edward J. Hammer, Kohler, Wis., Jerome Powell, Gall, Lane Howe, Washington, D.C., for Kohler Co. Max Raskin, Milwaukee, Wis., David Rabinovitz, Sheboygan

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thompson Ramo Wooldridge, Inc.

    305 F.2d 807 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times
    Refusing to enforce an order that prohibited violations of the statute "in any other manner"

  8. Federal-Mogul, Coldwater D. C. D. v. N.L.R.B

    394 F.2d 915 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 8 times

    No. 17873. May 21, 1968. John C. O'Meara, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner; Daniel J. Tindall, Jr., Detroit, Mich., on brief; Dickinson, Wright, McKean Cudlip, Detroit, Mich., of counsel. Arthur A. Horowitz, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior

  9. National Packing Company v. N.L.R.B

    377 F.2d 800 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 6 times

    No. 8839. May 23, 1967. Edward A. Smith, Kansas City, Mo. (George Schwegler, Jr., Wayne F. Caskey, Jr., and Smith, Schwegler Swartzman, Kansas City, Mo., and Holme, Roberts Owen, Denver, Colo., of counsel, were with him on the brief), for petitioner. Warren Davison, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., N.L.R.B., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before LEWIS,

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Associated Machines

    219 F.2d 433 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 8 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Associated Machines, 219 F.2d 433 (6th Cir. 1955), this court refused to enforce a Board order against an employer that had formed an employee committee with elected representatives that discussed with management "production problems, plant efficiency... and other problems of mutual interest."

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"