§

Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc.

344 N.L.R.B. 1270 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,296 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  4. Berman Enterprises v. Local 333

    454 U.S. 965 (1981)   Cited 174 times
    Holding an "affiliates" clause much like the Coal Lands clause legal under rule of reason analysis

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. The Baltimore Sun Co. v. N.L.R.B

    257 F.3d 419 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 9 times
    Noting that "misuse of accretion poses a significant threat to the self-determination rights of employees guaranteed by § 7 of the NLRA"

  7. Impact Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    847 F.2d 379 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 16 times
    Bargaining order imposed after a refusal to bargain, threats of plant closure, threats of discharge, and other egregious employer activities resulting in Union's election loss

  8. Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    296 F.3d 292 (4th Cir. 2002)   Cited 3 times
    Holding that Board must apply its principles consistently

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Stevens Ford, Inc.

    773 F.2d 468 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 16 times

    No. 1155, Docket 85-4010. Argued May 9, 1985. Decided September 20, 1985. John F. Welsh, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Collis Suzanne Stocking, Atty., Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. William E. Fitzgerald, Manchester, Conn. (Stephen T. Penny, Manchester, Conn., of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from National

  10. Universal Sec. Instruments v. N.L.R.B

    649 F.2d 247 (4th Cir. 1981)   Cited 20 times

    No. 80-1494. Argued February 4, 1981. Decided May 12, 1981. Warren M. Davison, Baltimore, Md. (Earle K. Shawe, Leslie R. Stellman, Stephen D. Shawe, Shawe Rosenthal, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for petitioner. Susan L. Williams, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief)

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,316 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355