Frontier Hotel & Casino

27 Cited authorities

Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper
447 U.S. 752 (1980) Cited 2,912 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a court may impose attorney's fee sanction against opposing counsel for “abusive litigation practices” only in “narrowly defined circumstances,” including where the court makes a finding that “counsel's conduct ... constituted or was tantamount to bad faith”
Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite
396 U.S. 375 (1970) Cited 1,418 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that causation of damages by materially misleading proxy misstatement could be established by showing that proxy solicitation was an "essential link in the accomplishment of the transaction"
F. D. Rich Co., v. Industrial Lumber Co.
417 U.S. 116 (1974) Cited 984 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Miller Act requirement that suits be brought in specific federal courts was “merely a venue requirement” that could be waived
Hall v. Cole
412 U.S. 1 (1973) Cited 962 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the plaintiffs acted on behalf of all union members, and reimbursing the attorneys' fees from the union treasury, such that all union members in effect equally contributed to the costs of litigation
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Fleischmann Corp. v. Maier Brewing
386 U.S. 714 (1967) Cited 684 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that the Lanham Act did not allow for counsel fees because the original text did not provide for them, nor did any subsequent amendments to the statute
Vaughan v. Atkinson
369 U.S. 527 (1962) Cited 748 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that attorney's fees can be awarded if a seaman proves that a shipowner failed to timely provide maintenance and cure
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Summit Valley Industries, Inc. v. Carpenters
456 U.S. 717 (1982) Cited 178 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Labor Management Relations Act § 303, which authorizes recovery of "damages" for employers injured by an unfair labor practice, does not provide authorization for awarding attorney's fees for Board proceedings
Virginia Electric Co. v. Board
319 U.S. 533 (1943) Cited 326 times
Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

Frontier Hotel & Casino

27 Cited authorities

Holding that a court may impose attorney's fee sanction against opposing counsel for “abusive litigation practices” only in “narrowly defined circumstances,” including where the court makes a finding that “counsel's conduct ... constituted or was tantamount to bad faith”

Holding that causation of damages by materially misleading proxy misstatement could be established by showing that proxy solicitation was an "essential link in the accomplishment of the transaction"

Holding that a Miller Act requirement that suits be brought in specific federal courts was “merely a venue requirement” that could be waived

Holding that the plaintiffs acted on behalf of all union members, and reimbursing the attorneys' fees from the union treasury, such that all union members in effect equally contributed to the costs of litigation

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Finding that the Lanham Act did not allow for counsel fees because the original text did not provide for them, nor did any subsequent amendments to the statute

Holding that attorney's fees can be awarded if a seaman proves that a shipowner failed to timely provide maintenance and cure

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding that Labor Management Relations Act § 303, which authorizes recovery of "damages" for employers injured by an unfair labor practice, does not provide authorization for awarding attorney's fees for Board proceedings

Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"