Frontier Homes Corp.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  2. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
  3. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
  4. Trailmobile Co. v. Whirls

    331 U.S. 40 (1947)   Cited 111 times
    Noting that the “interpretation of statutes cannot safely be made to rest upon mute intermediate legislative maneuvers”
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."
  6. Industrial Un. of Mar. Ship. W. v. N.L.R.B

    320 F.2d 615 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 63 times   4 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 14052, 14102. Argued May 21, 1963. Decided July 30, 1963. M.H. Goldstein, Philadelphia, Pa. (Goldstein Barkan, Michael Brodie, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, AFL-CIO. John H. Morse, New York City (Frank Cummings, New York City, Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City, on the brief), for Bethlehem Steel Co. (Shipbuilding Division). Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli

  7. Fagan v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

    173 F. Supp. 465 (M.D. Pa. 1959)   Cited 13 times

    Civ. A. No. 5968. May 15, 1959. I. Herbert Rothenberg, Philadelphia, Pa., Prowell, Kunkel Naugle, Harrisburg, Pa., for plaintiffs. Richard N. Clattenburg, Hermon M. Wells, Philadelphia, Pa., Nauman, Smith, Shissler and Hall, Harrisburg, Pa., for defendant, Pennsylvania Railroad Co. Allen Olmsted, 2nd, Philadelphia, Pa. (Saul, Ewing, Remick Saul, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel) Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Mulholland, Robie Hickey, Washington, D.C., of counsel), John