Fresh Direct

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.
102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996) Cited 55 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB was not conducting "improper pre-trial discovery" by issuing investigative subpoenas because it "was merely exercising its congressionally authorized investigative powers, nothing more."
Evans v. Stephens
387 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2004) Cited 15 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding President did not exceed constitutional authority in making recess judicial appointment
National Labor Relations v. Carolina Food Pro
81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996) Cited 17 times 1 Legal Analyses
Noting that a court should enforce an NLRB subpoena "if the information sought is relevant" and "described with sufficient particularly"
United States v. Woodley
751 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 14 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that recess appointments clause applies to all vacancies that exist when the Senate is in recess and noting that the courts and the executive branch have consistently adhered to this view
United States v. Allocco
305 F.2d 704 (2d Cir. 1962) Cited 25 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding the President may make appointments to all vacancies that exist during a Senate recess