Freight, Constr., General Drivers, Local 287

2 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators, & Paperhangers of America

    334 F.2d 729 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 4 times

    No. 14487. June 30, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Lee M. Modjeska, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Sydney L. Berger, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Before CASTLE, KILEY and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case is before the Court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor