§

Freedman, S., Electric, Inc.

256 N.L.R.B. 432 (N.L.R.B. 1981)
Freedman, S., Electric, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Haberman Const. Co.

    618 F.2d 288 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 79-1120. June 2, 1980. Rehearing Granted July 15, 1980. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate, Gen. Counsel, Charles P. Donnelly, John S. Irving, John E. Higgins, Jr., Robert E. Allen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Manitzas, Harris Padgett, J. Joe Harris, San Antonio, Tex., for respondent. Louis V. Baldovin, Jr., Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for other interested party. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before TUTTLE, GOLDBERG

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Sheridan Creations, Inc.

    357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 44 times
    In NLRB v. Sheridan Creations, Inc., 357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1005, 87 S.Ct. 711, 17 L.Ed.2d 544 (1967), the employer contended that its attempted withdrawal from the multi-employer bargaining unit was authorized because three of its four employees desired not to be represented by the union.

  3. Brockway Motor Trucks, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    582 F.2d 720 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that closing down of an employer's plant falls within statutory phrase "terms and conditions of employment"

  4. Carvel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    560 F.2d 1030 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 11 times
    Bargaining began for purposes of the Retail Associates rule when multiemployer bargaining unit answered union letter related to bargaining proposals

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Laredo Packing Co.

    625 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 1 times

    No. 79-2487. September 8, 1980. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Marion Griffin, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mann, Freed, Hansen Trevino, Laredo, Tex., Ben F. Foster, San Antonio, Tex., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GOLDBERG, TATE and SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The record in this labor case reveals a rather sordid story of respondent Laredo Packing Company's attempts to obstruct its

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Paskesz

    405 F.2d 1201 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times
    Affirming the Board's refusal "to recognize any significant distinction between . . . a suspension [from the multiemployer bargaining unit] and a voluntary withdrawal."

  7. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"