§

Fredeman's Calcasieu Locks Shipyard, Inc.

206 N.L.R.B. 399 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Fredeman's Calcasieu Locks Shipyard, Inc.

24 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  3. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  4. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  5. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Gotham Industries, Inc.

    406 F.2d 1306 (1st Cir. 1969)   Cited 32 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Gotham Indus., Inc., 406 F.2d 1306, 1309 (1st Cir. 1969), we pointed out that there were two ingredients to a § 8(a)(1) violation case based upon an employer's granting of benefits to his employees.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Milco, Inc.

    388 F.2d 133 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 32 times

    Nos. 108, 109, Dockets 31412, 31418. Argued October 19, 1967. Decided January 2, 1968. Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Atty., NLRB; Arnold Ordman, General Counsel; Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel; Gary Green, Attorney, NLRB, for petitioner. Harry H. Rains, Bertrand B. Pogrebin, Mineola, N.Y., for respondents. Before WATERMAN, MOORE and HAYS, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board, having found that respondents had engaged

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Ralph Printing Lithographing Co.

    379 F.2d 687 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times
    Recognizing that unfair labor practices claim against employer was subject to "the de minimis rule"

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford

    170 F.2d 735 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 49 times

    No. 10605. November 15, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the board against Wilbur H. Ford and others, doing business as Ford Brothers. Decree of enforcement granted. Harold Cranefield, of Detroit, Mich., and Robert N. Denham, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (David P. Finding, Ruth Weyand, and Thomas F. Maher, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner

  10. Hughes Hatcher, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    393 F.2d 557 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    Nos. 17412, 17517. April 17, 1968. William M. Saxton, Detroit, Mich., Robert J. Battista, Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust Kennedy, Detroit, Mich., Lee B. Brody, Smith, Hirsch Brody, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for petitioner Hughes Hatcher. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, Sheldon Klimist, Detroit, Mich., Bernard J. Firestone, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for petitioner Central States Joint Board etc. Theodore Sachs, Detroit, Mich., Rothe, Martson Mazey, Sachs O'Connell, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for intervenor