§

Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.

36-CA-010555 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 8, 2010)
Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 416 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge

  2. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  3. United States v. Chemical Foundation

    272 U.S. 1 (1926)   Cited 863 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that enemy-property custodian "was a mere conservator and was authorized to sell only to prevent waste"

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. Petrochem Insulation, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    240 F.3d 26 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Deferring to the NLRB's citation of a "company's decision to seek treble damages as additional evidence of retaliatory motive" but noting that "had the suit not been so meritless — our view might be different" (citing Kline v. Coldwell Banker Co., 508 F.2d 226, 235 (9th Cir. 1974) (characterizing antitrust treble damages as punitive))

  6. Venetian v. N.L.R.B

    484 F.3d 601 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 16 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding no unfairness where the court could "discern no difference between the incentives that the [plaintiff] may have had in its Ninth Circuit litigation and its incentives here. The stakes in its attempt before that court were no less than they are now."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Unbelievable, Inc.

    71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Unbelievable, Inc., 71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995), we upheld the Board's finding that the employer "engaged in unfair labor practices by eavesdropping on private conversations between employees and [a] Union representative," which occurred in the employee break room.

  8. Rule 615 - Excluding Witnesses from the Courtroom; Preventing an Excluded Witness's Access to Trial Testimony

    Fed. R. Evid. 615   Cited 1,405 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Finding that a motion to exclude a witness from the courtroom is generally grantable as of right and on the court's own motion