§

Frazier Industrial Co.

328 N.L.R.B. 717 (N.L.R.B. 1999)
Frazier Industrial Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adco Electric Inc.

    6 F.3d 1110 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that employee "recommend[ing] someone for hire and [bringing] problems with apprentice employees to the attention of [his superior] is nothing more than what [the employer] would expect from experienced employees"

  6. Restaurant Corp. of America v. N.L.R.B

    827 F.2d 799 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 11 times

    No. 85-1475. August 25, 1987. Marc B. Seidman, Atty., Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on respondent's petition for rehearing. Timothy J. O'Rourke, Marshall F. Berman and Michael A. Pace, Washington, D.C., were on petitioner's response to the petition for rehearing. Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before MIKVA and BORK, Circuit

  7. Manchester Health Center, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    861 F.2d 50 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 1056, 1057, Dockets 88-4004, 88-4012. Argued May 17, 1988. Decided November 8, 1988. Rolland Castleman, Lessner, Castleman Falkenstein, Manchester, Conn., for petitioner-cross-respondent. Frederick C. Havard, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Collis S. Stocking, Supervisory Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for res

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Daylin, Inc., Discount Division

    496 F.2d 484 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 9 times
    In Daylin, the retail store's no-solicitation rule prohibited all solicitation on its premises during "paid working hours.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Peyton Packing Co.

    142 F.2d 1009 (5th Cir. 1944)   Cited 22 times

    No. 10960. June 21, 1944. Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, sitting at Washington, D.C. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order against the Peyton Packing Company, Inc. Petition granted. Alvin J. Rockwell, Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Joseph B. Robison, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Eugene T. Edwards, of El Paso, Tex., for respondent. Before