§

Fraser & Johnston Co.

189 N.L.R.B. 142 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Fraser & Johnston Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Rapid Bindery, Inc.

    293 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 48 times
    In NLRB v. Rapid Bindery Inc., 293 F.2d at 176, the Second Circuit held that "conjecture or rumor is not an adequate substitute for an employer's formal notice to a union of a vital change in working conditions.

  4. International Tel. and Tel. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    382 F.2d 366 (3d Cir. 1967)   Cited 30 times
    Finding that a mixed unit of professional and non-professional employees, though frowned upon within section 9 of the Act, was still protected by section 8's bargaining requirement

  5. Local 57, Int. L. Garment W. U. v. N.L.R.B

    374 F.2d 295 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 19478, 19624. Argued February 11, 1966. Decided January 11, 1967. Certiorari Denied June 5, 1967. See 87 S.Ct. 2074, 2078. Mr. Max Zimny, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19478. Messrs. John A. McGuinn, Washington, D.C., and Joseph A. Perkins, Miami, Fla., with whom Mr. Guy Farmer, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners in

  6. Cooper Thermometer Company v. N.L.R.B

    376 F.2d 684 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 18 times
    Affirming a Board finding of an unfair labor practice where employer did not provide employees with information about how they could transfer to a new plant after operations at an initial plant were terminated

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Royal Oak Tool Machine Company

    320 F.2d 77 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 16 times

    No. 14789. July 1, 1963. Gerald Brissman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Peter M. Giesey, Attys. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. James D. Tracy, Detroit, Mich. (Paul H. Townsend, Jr., Dykema, Wheat, Spencer, Goodnow Trigg, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for respondents R O Manufacturing Company, Wendell G. Mouw, Garrett H. Mouw and Robert J

  8. Int'l United A., A., A. v. N.L.R.B

    394 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 7 times
    In UAW, Pierce Governor Company operated a production facility in Anderson, Indiana, where the employees were represented by Local 940; for several decades, the “contracts had been made between the Company ‘and the International and its Local 940, jointly (herein called “the Union”), as the “exclusive bargaining agency” for the employees....’ ” Id. at 761 (emphasis added).

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lewis

    246 F.2d 886 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 16 times
    In Lewis, a partnership that manufactured and sold shoes gradually transferred the manufacturing portion of its business to a corporation at a different location.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Hurley Company

    310 F.2d 158 (8th Cir. 1962)   Cited 8 times

    No. 17069. November 27, 1962. Jules H. Gordon, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel and Marion Griffin, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief, for petitioner. John H. Doesburg, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before JOHNSEN, Chief Judge, and MATTHES and RIDGE, Circuit Judges. MATTHES, Circuit Judge. This case is before us upon petition for enforcement