§

Franks Flower Express

219 N.L.R.B. 149 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Franks Flower Express

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  2. McGraw-Edison Company v. N.L.R.B

    419 F.2d 67 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 33 times

    No. 19429. December 4, 1969. Paul S. Kuelthau, of Moller, Talent Kuelthau, St. Louis, for petitioner and filed brief and reply brief. John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Robertamarie Kiley, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief with Mr. Burgoyne. Charles A. Werner, St. Louis, Mo., for intervenor; Gibson Langsdale, Kansas

  3. Marshfield Steel Company v. N.L.R.B

    324 F.2d 333 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 38 times

    No. 17315. November 20, 1963. Ransom A. Ellis, Jr., of Walker, Daniel, Clampett, Rittershouse Ellis, Springfield, Mo., made argument for the petitioner and filed brief. Leo N. McGuire, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for the respondent and Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief. Before VOGEL and MATTHES, Circuit Judges, and

  4. Smith-Weik Machinery Corp. v. Murdock Machine & Engineering Co.

    423 F.2d 842 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that the denial of a continuance does not rise to the level of an abuse of discretion unless the decision "severely prejudices" the moving party

  5. Great Lakes Screw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    409 F.2d 375 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 20 times
    In Great Lakes Screw Corp. v. NLRB, 409 F.2d 375 (7th Cir. 1969), where an NLRB hearing examiner excluded defendant's counsel from the hearing for "contumacious conduct," this court held that the exclusion violated defendant's due process rights, saying "[n]o compelling reason exists for not extending the requirement of adequate disclosure of the basis for contemptuous conduct findings to the quasi-judiciary as well as the judiciary."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Super Toys, Inc.

    458 F.2d 180 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 12 times

    No. 71-1450. March 29, 1972. Stephen H. Naiman (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Washington, D.C.; Abraham Siegel, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. David G. Moore (argued) of Reid, Babbage Coil, Riverside, Cal., for respondent. George Pappy, of Brundage, Neyhart, Miller, Ross Reich, Los Angeles, Cal., for the charging party. Before HAMLEY, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. HUFSTEDLER, Circuit

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Priced-Less Discount Foods, Inc

    405 F.2d 67 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 14 times
    Bargaining order upheld because the company assisted in the preparation and mailing of letters withdrawing union support

  8. Backer v. C.I.R

    275 F.2d 141 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 17 times

    No. 18035. February 18, 1960. Cubbedge Snow, Macon, Ga., for appellant. Floyd M. Buford, Asst. U.S. Atty., Frank O. Evans, U.S. Atty., Macon, Ga., for appellee. Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and TUTTLE, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Circuit Judge. This action covers a very narrow compass. Appellant is a Certified Public Accountant who had been employed in connection with preparation of the tax returns of one Walter D. Williams, Jr. In the course of investigation of Williams' tax affairs for

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Davidson Rubber Company

    305 F.2d 166 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 2 times

    No. 5948. July 13, 1962. James C. Paras, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, and Robert Sewell, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Julius Kirle, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement

  10. Mississippi Val. Struc. Steel v. N.L.R.B

    145 F.2d 664 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 2 times

    No. 12926. December 11, 1944. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relation Board. Proceeding by the Mississippi Valley Structural Steel Company against the National Labor Relations Board on petition to review an order of the Board, wherein the Board sought enforcement of an order. The Board directed to afford petitioner an opportunity to adduce additional evidence. George B. Logan, of St. Louis, Mo. (Cobbs, Logan, Roos Armstrong, of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for petitioner

  11. Section 555 - Ancillary matters

    5 U.S.C. § 555   Cited 1,245 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Providing that an agency's notice of denial "shall be accompanied by a brief statement of the grounds for denial"