Framan Mechanical Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  2. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
  3. Asarco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    86 F.3d 1401 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 22 times
    Finding of antiunion animus necessary to finding of section 8 violation
  4. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Murray Products, Inc.

    584 F.2d 934 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 18 times
    Noting that the Board has often held such short response times invalid under the Act
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company

    326 F.2d 509 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times

    Nos. 15014, 15015. January 14, 1964. Stephen B. Goldberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga. (Constangy Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., William E. Boston, Lawrenceburg, Tenn., on the brief), for respondent. Before WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.

    705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times

    No. 81-1693. October 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jacob Oliner, Oliner Oliner, New York City, for respondent. Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY, KRUPANSKY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges. ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the motion of the intervenor, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, for an order enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board in Limestone

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Betts Baking Co.

    428 F.2d 156 (10th Cir. 1970)   Cited 11 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Betts Baking Co., 428 F.2d 156, 159 (10th Cir. 1970), the court wrote that the offer was valid despite the time restriction because "[w]e think that [the employee's] failure to complain of the time limitation precludes him from complaining of the reasonableness of the reporting time."
  9. Texas Instruments Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    599 F.2d 1067 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 3 times
    In Texas Instruments, Inc. v. NLRB, 599 F.2d 1067 (1st Cir. 1979), we vacated and remanded that part of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) finding that Texas Instruments, Inc. (TI) violated sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1), (3) (1976), when it discharged six employees for disseminating information classified by the company as confidential.
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Savoy Laundry, Inc.

    327 F.2d 370 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times
    In Savoy Laundry the employer operated one laundry plant where he processed both retail laundry pickups and wholesale laundering.
  11. Section 34:11-56.25 - Public policy

    N.J. Stat. § 34:11-56.25   Cited 74 times

    It is declared to be the public policy of this State to establish a prevailing wage level for workmen engaged in public works in order to safeguard their efficiency and general well being and to protect them as well as their employers from the effects of serious and unfair competition resulting from wage levels detrimental to efficiency and well-being. N.J.S. § 34:11-56.25 L.1963, c.150, s.1.