§

Fox River Pattern, Inc.

199 N.L.R.B. 68 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Fox River Pattern, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  3. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Copps Corp.

    458 F.2d 1227 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 9 times

    No. 71-1231. April 18, 1972. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stanley J. Brown, Atty., N.L. R.B., Washington, D.C., Eugene G. Goslee, Acting Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Frank J. Bucaida, Madison, Wis., for respondent. Before SWYGERT, Chief Judge, and HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge, and SPRECHER, Circuit Judge. HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on application of the National Labor Relations

  5. National Labor Bd. v. Lake Superior Lumber

    167 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 36 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Lake Superior Lumber Corp., 6 Cir., 167 F.2d 147, 151, this court, in considering a similar contention, referred to the language of the Supreme Court in Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501, 66 S.Ct. 276, 90 L.Ed. 265, to the following effect: "`We do not agree that the corporation's property interests settle the question.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Zimnox Coal Company

    336 F.2d 516 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times

    No. 15335. September 14, 1964. Leo N. McGuire, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Henry M. Wick, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., and Dominic J. Bianco, Steubenville, Ohio (Coleman Bianco, Steubenville, Ohio, Richard J. Smith, Delisi, Wick Vuono, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief; Jack B. Josselson, Schmidt, Effron, Josselson

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tennessee Packers, Inc.

    390 F.2d 787 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 15751, 16061. March 6, 1968. Paul Elking and Charles M. Steele, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Asa R. Ambrister, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and O'SULLIVAN and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. These cases pertain to the computation of wages and interest due on

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Spiewak

    179 F.2d 695 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 14 times

    No. 9875. Argued March 24, 1949. Reargued May 16, 1949 and December 1, 1949. Decided February 2, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 11, 1950. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Gerald H. Chambers, New York City (Chambers Chambers, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, O'CONNELL, KALODNER