§

Fox-Art Theatres, Inc.

278 N.L.R.B. 812 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Fox-Art Theatres, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  3. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  4. Bastian-Blessing, Division of Golconda Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    474 F.2d 49 (6th Cir. 1973)   Cited 17 times
    Ruling that "[h]ealth insurance benefits clearly represent mandatory subjects for bargaining" and holding that the company's unilateral change in insurance providers was a "change in conditions of employment" under the NLRA because the record revealed that the new plan did not offer the same levels of coverage as the previous plan

  5. Nachman Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 421 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14566. October 7, 1964. Fredric N. Richman, Sidney R. Korshak, David H. Mendelsohn, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George H. Cohen, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Seymour Strongin, Attys., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG and KILEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by Nachman Corporation to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Coachman's Inn

    357 F.2d 134 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 4 times

    No. 18003. March 3, 1966. William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C.J. Lincoln, of House, Holmes Jewell, Little Rock, Ark., Robert B. Hill, of House, Holmes Jewell, Little Rock, Ark., for respondent. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges, and VAN PELT, District