§

Fort Apache Timber Co.

226 N.L.R.B. 503 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Fort Apache Timber Co.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Morton v. Mancari

    417 U.S. 535 (1974)   Cited 1,376 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Indian Commerce Clause empowers Congress to “single Indians out as a proper subject for separate legislation.”

  2. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Comm'n

    411 U.S. 164 (1973)   Cited 640 times
    Holding that state taxes are not applicable to Indians on reservations absent congressional consent

  3. Williams v. Lee

    358 U.S. 217 (1959)   Cited 717 times
    Holding the state courts lacked jurisdiction over dispute between non-Indian, on-reservation retailer and Indian debtors

  4. Arizona v. California

    373 U.S. 546 (1963)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress intended "to leave untouched the law of interstate equitable apportionment" with interstate portion of Section 8

  5. United States v. U.S. Fidelity Co.

    309 U.S. 506 (1940)   Cited 481 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that res judicata did not apply where district court had no statutory authority to adjudicate a claim against the United States

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natural Gas Utility District

    402 U.S. 600 (1971)   Cited 187 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding utility district was political subdivision under that standard

  7. Rice v. Olson

    324 U.S. 786 (1945)   Cited 348 times
    In Rice, the court reversed the conviction although the defendant did not request an attorney, where the trial court did not advise him of his right to make such a request.

  8. Warren Trading Post v. Tax Comm'n

    380 U.S. 685 (1965)   Cited 177 times
    Holding that comprehensive regulations and statutes are "in themselves sufficient to show that Congress has taken the business of Indian trading on reservations so fully in hand that no room remains for state laws imposing additional burdens upon traders."

  9. United States v. Kagama

    118 U.S. 375 (1886)   Cited 504 times
    Holding that Congress has authority to criminalize conduct that occurs on Indian reservations

  10. Maryland Cas. v. Citizens Nat

    361 F.2d 517 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 49 times
    Finding that the waiver of sovereign immunity in STOFI's charter was limited and did not include "the levy of any judgment, lien, or attachment upon the property of [STOFI]"

  11. Section 44 - Employment of Indians

    25 U.S.C. § 44   Cited 6 times

    In the Indian Service Indians shall be employed as herders, teamsters, and laborers, and where practicable in all other employments in connection with the agencies and the Indian Service. And it shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Interior and the Commissioner of Indian Affairs to enforce this provision. 25 U.S.C. § 44 Aug. 15, 1894, ch. 290, §10, 28 Stat. 313. EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS TRANSFER OF FUNCTIONSFor transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the